This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Goldstein, J. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Marxian Microfoundations: Contribution or Detour?

Department of Economics, Bowdoin College, 9700 College Station, Brunswick, ME 04011-8497jgoldste{at}bowdoin.ed

This article celebrates and critically examines the twenty-five-year productive, yet highly controversial, Marxian microfoundations (MM) literature. The contentious methodological debate over MM that is dominated by fundamentalist positions on both sides is evaluated and rejected. An alternative, centrist, methodological defense of MM is developed. Having established a methodological basis for MM, the micro contributions of the existing literature are evaluated in the following subject areas: methodology, accumulation and crisis, labor process and labor market segmentation, technical change, and class and exploitation. I conclude that although the MM literature has made significant contributions to strengthening Marxian arguments/propositions, there is room for improvement in the areas of integrating existing MM with common themes, improving modeling techniques, developing better linkages between micro and macro behaviors, expanding the analysis to neglected topics, and empirically verifying underlying assumptions.

Key Words: microfoundations of macroeconomics • Marxian microfoundations

Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 38, No. 4, 569-594 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0486613406293222


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?