Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Radical Political Economics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fine, B.
Right arrow Articles by Saad-Filho, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Transforming the Transformation Problem: Why the "New Interpretation" is a Wrong Turning

Ben Fine

Department of Economics, SOAS, University of London, Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG, United Kingdom

Costas Lapavitsas

Department of Economics, SOAS, University of London, Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG, United Kingdom cl5{at}soas.ac.uk

Alfredo Saad-Filho

Department of Economics, SOAS, University of London, Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG, United Kingdom

The new interpretation (NI) offers a particular understanding of important problems in value theory, especially the value of money and labor power and the structure and dynamics of capitalist accumulation. The NI is to be welcomed for raising these issues but not for the way in which it has dealt with them. Above all, the NI falsely assumes that value is directly and immediately represented by money. The authors propose alternatives that emphasize the processes (mediations) through which value is expressed as price. They draw on an alternative methodology and understanding of money, the value of labor power, and production and circulation of capital in the context of accumulation.

Key Words: transformation problem • labor theory of value • labor power • value of money • Marxist theory of price

Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 3-19 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0486613403261091
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cambridge J EconHome page
A. Brown
A materialist development of some recent contributions to the labour theory of value
Camb. J. Econ., January 1, 2008; 32(1): 125 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Review of Radical Political EconomicsHome page
J. Toporowski
Book Review: Social Foundations of Markets, Money and Credit
Review of Radical Political Economics, December 1, 2006; 38(4): 652 - 655.
[PDF]

Home page
 Review of Radical Political EconomicsHome page
D.-M. Rieu
A Reexamination of the Quantitative Issues in the New Interpretation
Review of Radical Political Economics, June 1, 2006; 38(2): 258 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]