This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Luce, S. Articles by Pollin, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Can U.S. Cities Afford Living Wage Programs? An Examination of Alternatives

Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003-7510, sluce{at}econs.umass.edu

Robert Pollin

Department of Economics and, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA 10003-7510, pollin{at}econs.umass.edu

Since 1994, so-called "living wage" ordinances have passed in 20 cities in the United States, and activists are advancing similar proposals throughout the country. These proposals are a response to the declining real wages of low-wage workers in the United States-what David Gordon termed "the wage squeeze" in Fat and Mean-and, in particular, to the 30 percent fall in the real value of the minimum wage from its peak in 1968. We consider here the main arguments advanced by opponents of living wage proposals: 1) they will place a heavy burden on municipal government budgets, forcing, among other things, cuts in vital city services that benefit low-income people; 2) they will encourage local businesses to relocate and discourage new businesses from investing within cities that have such ordinances; and 3) they will cause unemployment among low-wage workers. Examining these issues in the context of proposals that were either passed or considered in different cities, we find that none of the criticisms of living wage proposals stand up to careful scrutiny or evidence. Rather, living wage proposals are affordable and workable. They represent a small but significant step toward reversing the "wage squeeze" so carefully documented and analyzed in Fat and Mean.

Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 31, No. 1, 16-53 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/048661349903100103


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Mutari The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and Competing Visions of the Living Wage Review of Radical Political Economics, September 1, 2000; 32(3): 408 - 416. [Abstract] [PDF]