|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
deconstructing silence: the queer political economy of the social articulation of desire
Richard R. Cornwall
Department of Economics, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, cornwall{at}panther.mlddlebury.edu
Queer theory offers insights for political economy on how humans induce categories and conflate traits in ways psychologists call "illusory correlations." A Bayesian simulation is constructed of people interacting and using probits to compare their rankings of alternatives to estimate the subjective probability i.) that others have the same tastes as them, and ii.), for each alternative, that this alternative is their best choice. These simulations are found to, at least simplistically, resemble a type of illusory correlation which gained increased prominence in the United States from 1930 to 1960, and earlier in the United Kingdom when queer panics conflated "predatory" and "traitorous" with lesbian/gay. This modeling of the social articulation of preferences leads to conjectures on the role of Michel Foucault's épistémè (1972), Barbara Ponse's principle of consistency (1978), Jeffrey Escoffier's master code (1985), Sandra Bem's schema (1981), John R. Searle's Background (1990, 1992, 1995), and Judith Butler's linguistic norms (1993). Here these are called cognitive dispositions or codes, and are seen as social structures which grow as individuals try to form homopreference networks to process information in parallel, collectively. The concept of identity or ideology entrepreneurs is used to establish the importance of institutional analysis for political economy. Such an incorporation of desire on a par with logic-"rationality"-is called post/modern and is used to overcome the silence in both neoMarxian and neoclassical political economy on queer theory and queer issues.
Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 29, No. 1,
1-130 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/048661349702900101

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. McDonough
Social Structures of Accumulation Theory: The State of the Art
Review of Radical Political Economics,
June 1, 2008;
40(2):
153 - 173.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Pietrykowski
Exploring New Directions for Research in the Radical Political Economy of Consumption
Review of Radical Political Economics,
June 1, 2007;
39(2):
257 - 283.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Zafirovski
Measuring and Making Sense of Labor Exploitation in Contemporary Society: A Comparative Analysis
Review of Radical Political Economics,
December 1, 2003;
35(4):
462 - 484.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Danford
Workers, Unions and the High Performance Workplace
Work Employment Society,
September 1, 2003;
17(3):
569 - 573.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Thompson
Disconnected Capitalism: Or Why Employers Can't Keep Their Side of the Bargain
Work Employment Society,
June 1, 2003;
17(2):
359 - 378.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Fine
"Economic imperialism": a view from the periphery
Review of Radical Political Economics,
June 1, 2002;
34(2):
187 - 201.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. MICHALOWSKI and S. M. CARLSON
Crime, Punishment, and Social Structures of Accumulation: Toward a New and Much Needed Political-Economy of Justice
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice,
August 1, 2000;
16(3):
272 - 292.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Lafferty
Book Review: Responding to Crisis: State Withdrawal, Postmodern Fatalism, and the Possibilities of Radical Politics
Review of Radical Political Economics,
March 1, 1999;
31(1):
148 - 161.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|