This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Albert, M. Articles by Hahnel, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Socialism As It Was Always Meant To Be

Z Magazine, 116 St. Botolph St., Boston, MA 02115

Robin Hahnel

Department of Economics, The American University, Washington D.C. 20016

We argue for the feasibility and desirability of a "third way" besides markets and authoritarian planning by (1) describing the main features of a model of "participatory planning," and (2) responding to objections that the system requires too many meetings, is too intrusive, misfocuses democratic energies, and lacks sufficient incentives.

Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 24, No. 3-4, 46-66 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/048661349202400304


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Panayotakis Individual Differences and the Potential Tradeoffs Between the Values of a Participatory Economy Review of Radical Political Economics, March 1, 2009; 41(1): 23 - 42. [Abstract] [PDF]