Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Radical Political Economics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Role of the International Monetary Fund in the Post-Bretton Woods Era

Ron Phillips

Department of Economics, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colorado 80523

This paper examines the changing role of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in the world economy in the 1970s and into the 1980s. Though the IMF was established in 1945 by the Bretton Woods Agreement to aid countries with short term balance of payments problems, its role in recent years has changed dramatically. Many people argue that the IMF is becoming a world central bank with powers of surveillance over domestic economic policies, conditional loans to deficit countries, and control of world liquidity. The extent to which this is the case is a main focus of this paper.

In order to do this, it is necessary to review the events in the international monetary system in the 1970s with special attention given to those factors which affected the IMF's role. Though there are various interpretations of the IMF's role from both the mainstream and the radical-left, an alternative interpretation, which differs from those interpretations in many respects, is presented. My argument is that the IMF emerged in the 1970s as a global capitalist planner in response to the international economic crisis. Through international monetary reforms which occurred in the 1970s the IMF has played a pivotal role in the attempt to restore global accumulation. The failure of the IMF to accomplish this goal has been a direct result of global working class resistance to its policies.

Review of Radical Political Economics, Vol. 15, No. 2, 59-81 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/048661348301500203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Latin American PerspectivesHome page
M. Pastor Jr.
Latin America, the Debt Crisis, and the International Monetary Fund
Latin American Perspectives, January 1, 1989; 16(1): 79 - 110.
[PDF]